Many critics assume that the New Urbanism aims to create bounded places in which people can live simply and fulfill nostalgic hopes for completeness.
I have argued that there are no simple places or inhabitations anywhere, and so, whatever their intent, the effect of New Urbanist principles will be to create new kinds of places, where boundaries and centers may be effective in defining the place for local bodily perception and activity, but are also located within fields and flows that their patterns cannot fully control.
On the regional level New Urbanists would reshape sprawl into a field with many centers. There would be more and denser nodes, but still nodes. By their very multiplicity they would deny the isolation of each node, and the dominance of any single center.
(c) David Kolb, 1 August 2001