By Louis Dennig
Movie Columnist


In Peter Weir’s adaptation of two books - Master and Commander, and The Far Side of the World – which he aptly titled Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World, Russell Crowe leads his British warship the H.M.S. Surprise on what proves to be a very artistic yet ultimately boring story.

Crowe plays Captain Jack Aubrey, a passionate leader, and, as usual, commands the screen with his larger-than-life presence, making it easy to understand why his crew holds the utmost respect for him. Crowe’s powerful performance is reminiscent of his fantastic role in Gladiator. The problem with Master and Commander, however, is not its acting. It lies, instead with the storytelling.

First of all, there is no enemy in the movie. There is no face to put on all of the passion and anger the actors show towards the opposing ship, which keeps outsmarting the Surprise. Without any clear enemy, there has to be something that makes you want to root for the heroes, either an explicit definition of why the enemy is bad, or a profound love for the people on the boat, and neither of those is present in Master and Commander.

The ship that Crowe and his crew are fighting is a French ghost ship, which he has been ordered to destroy. Being a ghost ship, the audience rarely ever sees it, and never sees anything that the ships has done, which would have made us understand why it must be destroyed. Not having any back-story, besides the knowledge that it takes place during the Napoleonic wars, the audience doesn’t really have any reason to hate the French.

The battle sequences between the two ships seem unrealistic for some reason. Most of them consist of Crowe shouting to fire faster and the cannons roaring up. Even though a movie without much violence is appreciated, but a film about ship battle that is basically without gore is pretty unbelievable.

Besides the lack of an enemy, the story is pretty boring unless you’re really into watching ships. If you are, the shots and dedication to detail are incredibly impressive. But the story is really still pretty dull and slow moving. Not very much actually happens throughout the movie, and the one and only time the audience gets involved is in the last twenty minutes, when the ship’s loveable and intelligent doctor, Paul Bettany, is accidentally wounded.

Looking past the slow story, the attention to detail, acting and art direction are very impressive, and if there wasn’t a lack of enthusiasm towards the entire crew of the ship and their purpose, the movie would be excellently put together. Again, the ships look incredible, and the detail in the depictionst of life on a battle ship is paid extremely close attention. For example, in the opening shot each member of the ship’s crew is seen sleeping in what amounts to a potato sac of a hammock, packed in like sardines at the bottom of the ship.

For a moviegoer who loves ships, this is an excellent movie to see. However, if you don’t, and you’re looking for more plot and adventure, it might be something pretty hard to sit through.






Respond to this article
Master and Commander Sinks on Screen