Final Study Guide
| Lysias | Nichomacus | Why was it a crime to uproot an olive stump? | Androtion |
| Euctemon | probouleuma | Theomnsestus | Apollodorus |
| Stephanus | pallake | Describe the procedural setting and factual context of the lawsuits Stephanus had brought against Apollodorus prior to Against Nearea. | Styrybele |
| porne | Describe the family history of Pasion. | Phormio | Pasio |
| Pasicles | Archippe | Ktesiphon | paragraphe |
| Chrysippus | hubris | sycophant | feud |
| Demosthenes | Meidias | choregus | Ctesias |
| Conon | aikeia | Phanostratus | Ariston |
Give a brief summary of the factual and procedural issues in the case. Summarize the scholar's argument in a general fashion. Describe more explicitly the aspects of the model you will use to answer your question. Apply the model to the case. Feel free to critique the model if you feel it is inadquate. If other cases we have read will support your analysis, you should discuss them.
Was the plaintiff in Lysias 7 (Against the Olive Stump) a sycophant? How would Christ answer this question?
Why didn't Stephanus and Apollodorus get along? How would Cohen answer this question.
Why didn't Demosthenes sue Meidias? How would Johnstone answer this question?
What can Athenian forensic oratory tell us about gender in Athenian society?