I'd have to say stick with wireless. You're all to correct on the headaches of actually maintaining kiosk computers. It wouldn't be worth the hassle/time/money for the upkeep alone. With wireless all we maintain is the connection not the computers much less work / time / money. As for what people would actually use the wireless connection at the mall for that in my opinion is not our concern. Our concern is to actually promote a interest in community networking. If we can achieve this by putting wireless connections in the malls / parks / public buildings or where ever we get permision to do so i'm all for it. If the shops / community wish to make donations in thanks or to help so much the better to help expand our free services. Jim Allard jhart@mail.lewiston.lib.me.us wrote: > James Allard, jallard@lplonline.org writes: > > > You may not > >resell, share, sublicense or otherwise distribute the Residential Power Link > >Service or any portion thereof to any third party without the prior written > >consent of Adelphia. > > That's what I was afraid of. Probably any ISP will have this sort of > provision, with the possible exception of MSLN. Rick...Jim? What the > malls might have is another question. Since the wireless could be > considered part of their LAN, it might not be a problem. > > Another possibility would be to expand kiosk access in one or more of the > malls using Jeff's idea of inexpensive machines ( a couple of hundred > bucks or less ) hooked, via wire or wireless, to a server. Bates is > going to junk a bunch of machines that we might be able to get for > nothing if we guaranteed not to come back on them for support. > > Computer cost = $0 > Software cost = $0 (downloads from the 'Net) > Hard drive = $100 each (Bates removed the hard drives for data > security; putting hard drives in makes more sense than messing around > with PROMs and such, less server overhead, less work for us.) > Monitor = ? (depends on how many working monitors Bates is > tossing) > > Ethernet switch ~ $200 > Wiring = ? (would depend on distances and difficulty of running > it) > Securing machines = ? (some Bates machines have a provision for lock > down, but we'd have to buy cables and locks) > Furniture/stands = ? > > This is meant to be brainstorming...run the idea up the flagpole, so to > speak. Since wireless access only helps people with laptops, free kiosks > would reach a bigger audience, right? Maintaining kiosks could be a real > headache, though, what with food, drinks, sticky fingers, vandalism, > theft of parts, etc. Wireless should require much less attention once > it's set up, assuming the equipment is reliable and coverage of the > target area is even. > > What do you think? What gets you excited to go out and do? David > suggests malls other than the Auburn Mall. Who would you approach? > Should LPL be first, or a mall? Since Bookland went away, is that mall a > logical place? > > Can we discuss these ideas a little more and then come to a consensus? > > Jim Hart > "Working together we _can_ make a difference."
© 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Androscoggin Valley Community Network