In <490794974.54767809@oakhill.avcnet.org> RFuller@oakhill.avcnet.org (Roger Fuller) writes:
>Of course, this is not the most appropriate place to post this concern,
>however, it seems that we might also want to begin some kind of review of the
>conference structure for AVCNet. We should be able to gate most things in
>and out of Bates, and it seems that we have many conferences with little
>content;.... and little community interest yet. My suggestion is to review
>some of this and re-something the conferences so that all of us in AVCNet
>carry the same conferences....
It may well be the best place to discuss it. According to my records,
AVCNet currently involves the following newsgroups (the description is
mine, -not- official):
avcnet.admin system administration issues
avcnet.discuss general discussion, announcements, etc.
avcnet.test testing
avcnet.commnet issues, ideas, etc. about community networking.
avcnet.commonground a gate of the ME-Link conference "common ground"
avcnet.tech discussion of technical issues.
Because the traffic has been low, there hasn't been any reason for us
to be careful about where we post. Everything has just been put in
'discuss'. Perhaps we should drop groups that aren't being used. I
would like to see avcnet.admin and avcnet.tech stay, because I think
they will be useful in the future.
Are others carrying groups I don't have?
Jim Hart <jhart@h5.avcnet.org>
"Working together, we _can_ make a difference."
© 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Androscoggin Valley Community Network