Growth is possible in Broadacres as a fundamental form; not a mere accident of change but as integral pattern unfolding from within. (Wright 1935, 246)
Every kind of builder would be likely to have a jealous eye to the harmony of the whole within broad limits fixed by the county architect, an architect chosen by the county itself. Each county would thus naturally develop an individuality of its own. (Wright 1935, 247)
Nor is there much obvious repetition in the new city. Where regiment and row serves the general harmony of arrangement both are present, but generally both are absent except where planting and cultivation are naturally a process or walls afford a desired seclusion. Rhythm is the substitute for such repetitions everywhere. (Wright 1935, 244)
There should be as many kinds of houses as there are kinds of people and as many differentiations as there are different individuals. A man who has individuality (and what man lacks it?) has a right to its expression in his own environment. Wright, xxx)
[The houses in Broadacre City] would be especially suited in plan and outline to the ground, where they would make more of gardens and fields and nearby woods than now, insuring perpetual unity in variety. (Wright 1932, 8-9)
(c) David Kolb, 1 August 2001