|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Of the eight
persons names as authors of the
|
|
|
article [one that appeared
in print], some
|
|
|
claimed that they
had never reviewed the
|
|
|
original data
and most claimed that they had not
|
|
seen or approved
either the original version or
|
|
|
one or more of
the three revised versions of the
|
|
|
manuscript One
author claimed that he had
|
|
|
seen neither the
original data nor any version of
|
|
|
the manuscript.
Thus, there was a egregious
|
|
|
disregard of the
principles of authorship …
|
|