Staff Advisory Committee

 

MINUTES

Monday, January 27, 2003

 

 

Attendees: Jane Bedard, Jan Bureau, Nancy Crosby, Elaine Hansen, Christopher Lee, David Long, Keith Pray, Mary Risko, Anthony Shostak, and Keith Tannenbaum, Eileen Wisnewski

 

Members Not Present: Carol Carpentier, Paul Dumais, Jeannine Ferron, Jane Frizzell, Brenda Hammond, Carol Wyse-Ricker

 

 

Discussion Items:

 

1. President Hansen began the meeting by updating us on the Board of Trustee meetings. She stated that the Trustees did some minor restructuring of the Board and eliminated or combined some standing committees enabling the Board to work more effectively.

 

2. Chris Lee then informed us that the Employee Recognition Luncheon will be held on Friday, April 18, 2003. He also informed the Committee that Wednesday, April 23, 2003 will be National Administrative Assistants day with activities planned throughout the day.

 

3. Chris then reported that 303 responses had been received from this year's Staff Opinion Survey -- down slightly from last year's number of 319 responses.

 

4. The question was then asked about possible layoffs at Bates (due to Bowdoin's recent announcement). President Hansen responded by stating that did not foresee any immediate changes of this magnitude at Bates and explained that our situation differs from Bowdoin's due to hiring practices and the endowment size. She also stated that there is a silver lining to a smaller endowment in that if you have to cut 5% of your spending and you've always had less to spend, you then have less to cut.

 

5. Suggestion Box items were then read:

 

Chris Lee was handed 7 more Staff Opinion Surveys that were placed in the Suggestion Box -- which brought the total to the total of 303 which was reported under item #3 above.

 

There were a couple letters in the Suggestion Box stating that some employees believe that it is unfair that newly hired hourly personnel (as of July 2001) receive 10 vacation days, 10 sick days, 11 1/2 holidays and 2 personal days, while hourly employees hired prior to July 2001 receive 18 vacation days, 10 sick days, 11 1/2 holidays and 2 personal days. Although this may seem unfair at first glance, the College felt that in fairness to all employees, it was time to implement this change, thus "grandfathering" hourly employees hired prior to July 2001 with the system which they were hired under, and at the same time giving those employees with many years of service to the College a slight "bonus." Note: This does not affect those employees who are salaried employees — their vacation days remain at 24 upon their hiring.

 

A suggestion was made that the College give employees 2 to 3 snow days a year with pay so that vacation or personal days would not have to be used. If those days were not used, they could then be applied to personal days or choice time. A solution to this would be to take time off without pay (for hourly employees) or comp time (for salaried employees) -- stated in the Employee Handbook as one of the few situations that this is acceptable. The College understands that Maine winters are difficult for some employees who have to travel a distance; however, the decision to come to work or not is an individual choice and one that each of us needs to make. The College hopes that each individual choosing to stay home on a storm day is able to make other arrangements to make up their time, etc. A paid storm day would not be feasible to all the essential personnel who must report to work during storms.

 

A letter in the Suggestion Box asked that the College change the check cashing procedures. The only place on campus to cash a check in Libbey Forum. When one arrives at Libbey, you must sign in and wait your turn. It tends to get a bit busy at Libbey at times. This particular individual went to Libbey to cash a check at lunchtime and when they arrived there were 6 to 8 students waiting to be served. The individual signed in and waited -- and on this particular day and time there was only 1 person serving everyone. For those employees who have their paychecks automatically deposited (as encouraged by the College) there are times when a personal check needs to be cashed for spending money and it is discouraging if one has to wait longer here on campus to cash a personal check than if one would go to a bank. If employees need to go to a bank to cash a personal check, then there is no reason to have automatic deposits -- one might just as well go to the bank and cash their paycheck.

 

There was a suggestion that the College announce when it will be serving alcoholic beverages at campus functions, especially at an event when employees and families are invited. Apparently, some employees were surprised to find beer and wine being at the President's Holiday Reception. Some thought that it was inappropriate in light of recent campus events involving students. They thought the holiday reception to be more of a cocktail party than the family/staff meal they had expected. While it was not the College's intention to create a cocktail party environment for the purpose of consuming large quantities of alcohol, perhaps it could have been better thought of as an atmosphere in which the Bates community was provided an opportunity to show responsible-open drinking of alcohol in a social environment therefore setting examples that differ from the typical college drinking environment such as dorm parties or late night/early morning drinking. In any case, it seemed that the larger part of the Bates community who attended the Holiday Reception seemed to really enjoy it and the beer and wine was kept to a minimum and everyone exhibited responsible adult interaction.

 

 

 

 

Submitted by David Long

 

<head>


Jane K. Frizzell
Last modified: Thu May 15 17:39:28 EDT 2003