Culture and Interpretation
CULTURE AND INTERPRETATION attempts to understand the central role that the notion of culture has played in anthropology and the human sciences in general. It begins from an indea that has guided considerable amounts of social science thinking over the last century--that human beings are animals, to use Max Weber's language, who live suspended in webs of meaning that they themselves have spun. Culture, on this model, creates different ways of being in the world, one for each distinct community. The centrality of the notion of culture depends on its relationship to a number of other issues that organize social sicence work--the idea of meaning, the place of everyday practice, and the relationship between power and ideology.
No idea in anthropology is more powerful, and no idea is more arguable. CULTURE AND INTERPRETATION lays out the arguments for the idea of culture and then discusses a variety of critiques that call into question the very idea that "culture" can deliver what many social anthropologists think is the anthropological task--giving people of one society the means to understand those of another. Because the concept of culture is bound up with problems of knowing--that is, thinking about standards of justification for claims about knowing something, e.g., that snow is white or meditation produces altered states of consciousness, CULTURE AND INTERPRETATION is also concerned with whether anthropology can be a science, what warrants one interpretation over others, and what role relativism plays in thinking responsibly about the world.



| January 12 (Tu) | The Course
|
| January 14 (Th) | Found in Translation
Geertz, "Found in Translation: On the Social History of the Moral Imagination," in Local Knowledge, pp. 36-54.
|
| January 19 (Tu) | Interpretation and Others
Geertz, "From the Native's Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding," in Local Knowledge, pp. 55-70.
|
| January 21 (Th) | Culture and Coherence
Geertz, "Common Sense as a Cultural System," in Local Knowledge pp. 73-93. |
| January 26 (Tu) | Culture, Economy, and Experience
Geertz, "Art as a Cultural System," in Local Knowledge, pp. 94-120.
|
| January 28 (Th) | Relativism
Geertz, "On the Uses of Diversity," reprint at the reserve desk.
|
| February 2 (Tu) |
Postmodern Bourgeois Liberalism Fights Back
Rorty. "On ethnocentrism: A response to Clifford Geertz," reprint on reserve.
|
| February 4 (Th) | Commentary on Geertz DUE |
| February 9 (Tu) |
Critique and Challenge
Crapanzano, "Hermes' Dilemma: The Masking of Subversion in Ethnographic Description," in Marcus and Clifford, eds., Writing Culture, pp. 51-76, on reserve.
|
| February 11(Th) |
Reflexive or Experimental Ethnography
Crapanzano, Tuhami,pp. ix-72.
|
| February 23 (Tu) |
Tuhami
|
| February 25 (Th) |
Tuhami
Crapanzano, Tuhami,pp. 73-173.
|
| March 2 (Tu) |
The Reflexivist Critique of Geertz
Ethnography Paper DUE
|
| March 4 (Th) |
Postmodernism
Jameson, "Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism," New Left Review, pp. 53-92, on reserve.
|
| March 9 (Tu) | The Written Suburb
Dorst, The Written Suburb, pp. 1-100.
|
| March 11(Th)
|
Chadds Ford as a Postmodern Site
Dorst, The Written Suburb, pp. 101-210.
|
| March 16 (Tu) | The Postmodernist Critique of Geertz
|
| March 18 (Th) | Feminism and Postmodernism
Harding, "Is there a Feminist Method?", on reserve.
|
| March 23 (Tu) | The Hot Spell
Wolf, A Thrice Told Tale,pp. 15-92.
|
| March 25 (Th) | The Woman who didn't become a Shaman
Wolf, A Thrice-Told Tale, pp. 93-139.
|
| March 30 (Tu) | Literature and Ethnography |
| April 1 (Th) | The Feminist Critique of Geertz |
| April 5-9 | Reading Week |

I value what students have to say, sometimes to the extent of letting people go off on tangents. Hanging 15% of final grades on class participation is a form of coercion, but I believe learning to talk in an academic setting is as important as learning to think analytically or use a computer. Students usually assume that they are being judged on the content of their comments. I judge students merely on whether they say something. There are no dumb comments--there are only students who do not contribute to class and students who do. In my experience, the only mistake a student makes in class is imagining her or his comments are worth airing on every topic. If you are a verbal person, let other people have a chance at it. If you are not verbal, recognize that your ideas are often more incisive than those of people who talk regularly. Make an effort to make your ideas known, whether it is the first day of class or late March.
e-mail responses: skemper@bates.edu
Last Updated: January 5, 1999